

 
Bing Nursery School
2005 |
Praising Intelligence: Costs to Children's Self-Esteem
and Motivation
Professor Carol Dweck, Bing Distinguished Lecture Series
By Christine VanDeVelde
“You’re such a great artist!”
“You’re so smart!”
Who would ever imagine that praising a child could be bad? After all, we
love our children and want them to have high self-esteem. We want them
to go out into the world thinking well of themselves, trusting their
abilities, succeeding.
But it turns out even well-intended praise for children’s talents and
abilities can backfire. In May, developmental and social psychologist
Dr. Carol Dweck addressed the Bing community in the 2007 Distinguished
Lecture to explain why and how praise can drain a child’s self-esteem
and sap motivation.
One of the world’s experts in the study of motivation, Dr. Dweck has
spent the last forty years looking at why and how people achieve their
potential—or don’t. Her research has, in fact, led to the creation of a
new field in educational psychology—achievement goal theory. The results
of her work have been used around the world with children, athletes,
businessmen and others. And as you will see, the role of praise is
integral.
But before the role of praise can be understood, it’s necessary to grasp
the fundamental models that underlie Dweck’s work—the fixed mindset and
the growth mindset. This is one of Dweck’s most important findings—that
there are two different mindsets that children (and adults) can have
about their intelligence and abilities.
Some individuals have a fixed mindset. They think their abilities,
talents, and intelligence are fixed traits. “They have only a certain
amount, and that’s that,” says Dweck. Those with fixed mindsets might
believe, for example, that intelligence is determined at birth.
Other individuals have a growth mindset. They think intelligence and
abilities are things that can be developed and cultivated throughout
life. “People with a growth mindset don’t think everybody’s the same,”
cautions Dweck, “but they believe that everyone—through effort,
dedication, schooling, experience—can grow.”
How do researchers measure the mindsets of children? By asking them to
agree or disagree with statements like the following: “Everyone has a
certain amount of intelligence, and they can’t really do much to change
it.” Or… “To be honest, people can’t change how intelligent they are.”
Children who disagree with statements like these have a growth mindset;
those who agree have a fixed mindset.
In study after study, Dweck has found that individuals build an entire
psychology of motivation around the mindset they hold. In one such
study, Dweck and her researchers set out to measure and define the
mindsets of 400 students making the transition to junior high school.
(While Dweck’s studies have included preschoolers, most of the research
she discussed involved older children. While she noted that these
mindsets are found in children as young as three or four, older children
have more articulated ideas about intelligence and are starting to show
different motivational patterns.)
In this particular study, students with growth mindsets cited learning
as the most important goal. They agreed with statements such as, “It’s
much more important for me to learn things in my classes than it is to
get the best grades.” They cared about grades, but their first priority
was learning. “In other words, if you think your intelligence can be
developed,” says Dweck, “that’s what you want to do.”
But for students with fixed mindsets, looking smart and being judged
smart were the most important goals. They agreed with statements such
as, “The main thing I want when I do my schoolwork is to show how good I
am at it.” Notes Dweck, “If you think it’s a fixed trait, you’ve got to
have it, and you’ve got to have other people thinking you have it, too.”
Further, Dweck found that children with fixed and growth mindsets have
completely different and even opposite beliefs about effort. Individuals
with growth mindsets believe effort is one of the most important things
in life for achievement. They say the harder you work at something, the
better you’ll be at it. They appreciate that no creative genius has
contributed anything of note without years of dedication and work.
But individuals with a fixed mindset think effort is negative. They
believe that if you have ability, you shouldn’t need effort. And if you
need effort, you’re not very smart. They believe that things come easily
to people who are true geniuses. “And that’s false,” says Dweck. “It may
come a little more easily to geniuses han it does to other people, but
it doesn’t come easily.”
Dweck believes this is among the most destructive beliefs a person can
hold: that hard work means you’re incapable. And it gets students in a
fixed mindset into a trap. They want to look smart, but they think
effort makes them look dumb. She characterizes this as a paralyzing
conjunction of goals and beliefs.
Another building block in the psychology that develops around a
particular mindset is the individual’s reaction to setbacks. As part of
the same study, students were given a hypothetical scenario: “Imagine
you’re in a new class. You like the class. You like the teacher. You
studied a medium amount for the first test, but when you got it back,
you got a 54, and that’s an F. How would you feel? What would you think?
What would you do?”
Those with a growth mindset had explanations that were effort and
strategy-oriented, resilient explanations. They said, “Maybe I didn’t
study hard enough, or maybe I didn’t go about studying in the right
way.” After all, they were told they only studied a “medium” amount.
But those with the fixed mindset had explanations of resignation. They
said, “I guess I wasn’t smart enough.” Or… “I’m just not good at this
subject.” “Why would they conclude this after one ‘medium’ session of
study for a test?” says Dweck. “Well, remember, if you have ability, you
shouldn’t need more than medium studying. So from one outcome, they
inferred their ability.”
Students were then asked what they would do. Those with a growth mindset
said things such as, “I’d work harder in this class from now on.” Or… “I
would spend more time studying for tests.” That makes sense: a medium
amount of studying didn’t work, so the response is to get help, to study
more. But those with a fixed mindset said, “I would spend less time on
this subject from now on.” Or... “I would try not to take this subject
ever again.” Told they liked the teacher and the subject, the students
with fixed mindsets still didn’t change their response. Their motivation
was gone.
Further, students with a fixed mindset responded that they would try to
cheat on the next test. “It makes sense within that framework,” says
Dweck. “If they don’t have ability, if effort is aversive and
ineffective, what courses of action are left to these students?” So the
fixed mindset is a system in which you have ability or you don’t. If you
have ability, you shouldn’t have to work hard. If you don’t have
ability, anything goes.
Parents, grandparents, educators—everyone sends messages to children,
whether they’re aware of it or not. So what made Dweck think about the
message that praising intelligence sends and why did she intuit that it
could have drawbacks?
Her studies had shown that students who worried about their intelligence
were vulnerable. “Am I going to look smart on this test?” “Should I take
this risk?” So if parents or teachers praised children’s intelligence,
Dweck hypothesized, didn’t that tell the child that intelligence is the
most important thing in the world, that this is what parents and
teachers cared about? And would it put such a child in a fixed mindset
where they worried about being judged, shied away from challenges, and
lost their motivation when things got rough? Dweck wanted to find out.
In a series of studies of both kindergarten-age students and 5th
graders, children were given a non-verbal IQ test that consisted of ten
moderately challenging but doable problems.
Most of the children performed well on the first ten problems. One third
were given intelligence praise. They were told, “Wow, you got eight
right; that’s a really good score. You must be smart at this!” Another
third were given effort praise: “Wow, you got eight right; that’s a
really good score. You must have tried really hard!” The control group
was given results praise and told, “Wow, that’s a really good score.”
And sure enough, when intelligence alone was praised, it put students in
a fixed mindset.
The students were then asked, “What do you want to work on now? I have
some easier things here that you could work on, or I have some
challenging problems. They’re hard, and you’ll make mistakes, but you’ll
learn some important things.” Most of the students who were praised for
intelligence chose the easy task. “They’re not fools!” says Dweck. “They
wanted to keep on looking smart. They wanted to keep that label.”
But the vast majority of the students praised for their effort wanted
the challenging task. They wanted something they could learn from, and
they weren’t worried about making mistakes. So right away the study had
created one of the hallmarks of a fixed mindset by praising
intelligence. “They said, ‘Don’t give me a challenge; give me something
I can look smart on,’” says Dweck.
When the students were then given a series of more difficult problems,
these results were magnified. Students who had been told they were smart
now thought that having to struggle meant they weren’t smart at all.
They thought they had low ability at the task. So their confidence in
their ability, which is like self-esteem, plummeted. Because again, if
success meant they were smart, failure or difficulty meant they were
not. “They were being taught to measure themselves by the outcome,” says
Dweck. “We’d say, ‘Hey, you did it; you must be smart.’ They said, ‘Hey,
I didn’t do it; I must not be smart.’”
But those who had been praised for their effort thought, “I need more
effort. These problems are harder. You succeed through effort. I need
more of it.” This group remained very engaged with the task. They tried
different strategies, and their motivation remained high. At the end,
asked to rate how much they enjoyed the problems, those who were praised
for their intelligence showed a sharp drop-off in their enjoyment once
they hit the hard problems. Those who had been praised for effort showed
no drop-off and many of them said that the harder problems were their
favorites.
The students were also asked if they would like to take the problems
home to practice. Among those who were praised for effort, most were
eager to take the problems home, and had responses such as, “Could you
write down the name so when they run out my mom can buy me more?” But
those who had been praised for their ability had responses such as, “No
thanks, I already have these at home.” As soon as they had to struggle,
those who had been praised for their ability lost faith in that ability
and any enjoyment in the task.
Over three sets of tests, this same group—those who had been praised for
intelligence—also showed a significant decline in their performance. So
praising intelligence had made these students less intelligent. Those
who had been praised for effort, however, showed a significant increase
in their performance on the IQ tests over the trials. (The control group
was right in the middle.)
But there was a further finding that was both more distressing and
interesting. When asked to write anonymously about their experience, the
students were also asked to report the scores that they had earned.
Almost 40% of the intelligence-praised children lied, reporting a higher
score. “They lied in one direction, and one direction only!” says Dweck.
“And what this meant to me was that when children were praised for their
intelligence, it became such an important part of who they are, it was
so fundamental to their self-esteem that they couldn’t even tell the
truth on an anonymous piece of paper to someone they would never meet.”
The results were clear: praising intelligence made students avoid
challenge. In the face of difficulty, it made them lose any pleasure in
a task they had originally enjoyed. They lost faith in themselves and
their performance plummeted. Finally, it led them to lie. “These were
children who were randomly assigned to that condition. They were no
different from anyone else to begin with,” notes Dweck. “And yet one
sentence of intelligence praise put them in the fixed mindset where what
they cared most about was looking smart, and where they couldn’t cope
with challenges.”
Dweck says they were so surprised by these findings and how dramatic
they were that they repeated the study five more times, in many
different locations, from the inner city of New York to Iowa. They had
the same findings in all studies, including a further praise study
conducted at Bing Nursery School.
So which mindset do most people actually hold—a fixed mindset or a
growth mindset? According to Dweck, it’s about 40-40. About 40% of
children and adults believe intelligence is fixed, and about 40% agree
it’s something that can be changed. About 20% in the middle don’t take
sides.
As to who is right, well, the subject has been fiercely debated within
psychology. But more and more, cognitive psychologists are coming to
understand that very important components of intelligence can be
developed. Neuroscience is showing a greater plasticity of the brain
than was ever imagined, reports Dweck.
So does that mean mindsets can be changed? “The answer to that is yes,
they can be changed,” says Dweck, who of course had already set out to
prove it. A few years ago, she had begun to wonder whether children
could be taught a growth mindset and whether this would enhance their
school achievements. In a study with 100 7th graders, she looked at
whether teaching students a growth mindset would help their plummeting
achievement.
Two random groups were given eight study skills sessions. The
growth-mindset group got six sessions of study skills and two sessions
on the growth mindset and how to apply it to their schoolwork. These
students were given an article to read that said, “You can grow your
intelligence. New research shows the brain can be developed like a
muscle.” They were taught that the more you exercise your brain, the
stronger it gets, and that every time they learned something new their
brain was forming new connections, and over time becoming stronger and
smarter.
“This riveted the students! They loved learning about the brain,” says
Dweck. “They’d never thought about it, how it worked. They never
realized that what they did had a direct impact on their brain and the
connections it made. And a lot of the students who had no interest in
the workshop suddenly participated vigorously.” These students showed a
significant rebound in their math grades.
But the students who got only study skills in their eight sessions and
no growth-mindset skills continued on their downward plunge. They didn’t
have the motivation to put the study skills into practice.
Dweck and her team are now working on developing a computer-based
growth-mindset intervention similar to the model used in this study.
Called Brainology, it’s currently being tested in 20 New York City
schools. In it, the two main characters, Chris and Dahlia, are guided
through the program by the Brain Orb. Visiting state-of-the-art brain
labs, they are instructed by a mad brain scientist, conduct virtual
experiments on brains and watch brain cells create connections
simulating what happens when learning takes place—a condition also known
as growth. |